Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
| Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?

Maximilian Friedersdorff


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Un o’r 4 prifysgol uchaf yn y DU a’r orau yng Nghymru am fodlonrwydd myfyrwyr.
(Arolwg Cenedlaethol y Myfyrwyr 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk

Top 4 UK university and best in Wales for student satisfaction
(National Student Survey 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk

Hi All,

I want to make a galaxy instance publicly and freely available.  However
some/all of the tools installed are computationally expensive.
Computing time is expensive and resources are limited, so there should
be some sort of rate limiting to prevent abuse. In my case the most
sensible route would be to limit users to a certain number of CPU hours
per time period in addition to concurrent job limits and maximum job
length.

Is there any demand for something like this to be implemented within
galaxy?  If so I would like to implement this functionality
``properly'', rather than as a quick hack.

Thanks

___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

signature.asc (463 bytes) Download Attachment
| Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?

Björn Grüning-3
Hi Maximilian,

I think there is a demand and partially Galaxy has support for these
kind of limits for a user. Please have a look at:

https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/config/job_conf.xml.sample_advanced#L725

An extension to these would be super cool!
Thanks,
Bjoern

Am 23.11.2016 um 10:51 schrieb Maximilian Friedersdorff:

>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Un o’r 4 prifysgol uchaf yn y DU a’r orau yng Nghymru am fodlonrwydd myfyrwyr.
> (Arolwg Cenedlaethol y Myfyrwyr 2016)
> www.aber.ac.uk
>
> Top 4 UK university and best in Wales for student satisfaction
> (National Student Survey 2016)
> www.aber.ac.uk
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
>   https://lists.galaxyproject.org/
>
> To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
>   http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
>
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
| Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?

Maximilian Friedersdorff


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Un o’r 4 prifysgol uchaf yn y DU a’r orau yng Nghymru am fodlonrwydd myfyrwyr.
(Arolwg Cenedlaethol y Myfyrwyr 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk

Top 4 UK university and best in Wales for student satisfaction
(National Student Survey 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk

> I think there is a demand and partially Galaxy has support for these
> kind of limits for a user. Please have a look at:
>
> https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/config/job_conf.xml.sample_advanced#L725

Yes I'm aware of the existing limits.  An ideal (from my point of view)
implementation would simply add another possible type to these.

> An extension to these would be super cool!

Ok that's all I needed to hear :-).  I guess I should base any changes
on the [dev] branch?

Thanks

Max

PS. My apologies for the email signature below, over which I have no control.

___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

signature.asc (463 bytes) Download Attachment
| Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?

Martin Čech
Max: 

you are correct, the dev branch is what would be the best to develop against. Also feel free to open PR with work in progress at any point. I am sure you will get useful feedback.

Thank you for using Galaxy,

Martin

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:40 AM Maximilian Friedersdorff <[hidden email]> wrote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Un o’r 4 prifysgol uchaf yn y DU a’r orau yng Nghymru am fodlonrwydd myfyrwyr.
(Arolwg Cenedlaethol y Myfyrwyr 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk

Top 4 UK university and best in Wales for student satisfaction
(National Student Survey 2016)
www.aber.ac.uk



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Maximilian Friedersdorff <[hidden email]>
To: 
Cc: Maximilian Friedersdorff <[hidden email]>, "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:40:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] Is there demand for rate limiting in Galaxy?
> I think there is a demand and partially Galaxy has support for these
> kind of limits for a user. Please have a look at:
>
> https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/config/job_conf.xml.sample_advanced#L725

Yes I'm aware of the existing limits.  An ideal (from my point of view)
implementation would simply add another possible type to these.

> An extension to these would be super cool!

Ok that's all I needed to hear :-).  I guess I should base any changes
on the [dev] branch?

Thanks

Max

PS. My apologies for the email signature below, over which I have no control.
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Loading...